Scarlet Pros

1. Modern Communication: Young, tech-savvy team uses tools like shared Slack channel for communication.
2. Innovative Submission Process: Uses GitHub and markdown files instead of traditional PDF/Excel documents.
3. Structured Guidance: Atomic forms provide clear expectations and reduce ambiguity.
4. Remote Audits: Less time-consuming than traditional on-site audits.
5. Responsive to Feedback: Implements improvements in a reasonable timeframe.
6. Customer-Centric Approach: More focused on customer needs compared to traditional notified bodies.

Scarlet Cons

1. High Learning Curve: Requires proficiency in GitHub and markdown, challenging for non-technical staff.
2. Lack of Overview: Splitting documents into multiple files makes it difficult to maintain a holistic view.
3. Unclear Process Structure: Unexpected additional checks and steps not communicated in advance.
4. Expensive Subscription Model: Potentially high long-term costs, especially for startups.
5. Rigid Software: Limited flexibility for customization or adding rationale for decisions.
6. QMS Limitations: Not a complete QMS solution, requiring additional tools and manual work.
7. Data Export Challenges: Difficulty in converting data back to traditional document formats.

Performance

Best Suited For

Not Recommended For

Additional Notes

(Editorial note: Scarlet charges a monthly fee, in this case 5k€ / month. As our price field only displays numbers, we entered an exemplary cost over 2 years which is 5k€ * 24 months = 120k€.)