This SOP describes how Post-Market Surveillance is performed for products. It ensures that new information about safety and performance is proactively collected and can be used as input for the risk management, clinical evaluation and software development of our products.
Process Owner | <enter role of process owner> |
Key Performance Indicators | <enter KPIs to be tracked for the Management Review> |
This process is followed for each product separately, meaning that for each product, a Post-Market Surveillance Plan and Periodic Safety Update Report are created and continuously updated.
Note: For class I devices, you could specify a longer update interval, e.g. once every two or three years.
Note: Feel free to assign the responsibility to any other role. It typically makes sense to choose a role that is both close to product development as well as clinical issues.
Based on the clinical evaluation and technical documentation, a new Post-Market Surveillance Plan is created for a product.
For medical devices of class IIa, post-market surveillance cycles may extend to no longer than two years. For medical devices of classes IIb and III, annual surveillance cycles apply. For devices of class IIa and higher, each surveillance cycle is concluded with the compilation of a periodic safety update report (see below). For class I devices, longer surveillance cycles may be defined.
Participants |
---|
QMO |
Product Manager |
Input | Output |
---|---|
Device Description | Post-Market Surveillance Plan |
Clinical Evaluation | |
Risk Management Report |
The Post-Market Surveillance is carried out as described in the Post-Market Surveillance Plan in the defined interval.
The responsible employees continuously collect information from all the categories described below and enter them into the report template.
At minimum, the following information categories have to be taken into consideration:
For each part of information, it is assessed whether it is applicable to the company’s product. Additionally, the severity of impact on device safety and performance is rated on the following scale:
Depending on the applicability, severity and observed trends of the new information, appropriate actions are initiated. The QMO and the Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC) must be consulted in this step, other roles (e.g. medical staff) should be involved if needed.
Actions may entail:
Participants |
---|
QMO |
Product Manager |
Input | Output |
---|---|
Post-Market Surveillance Plan | Evaluated Information |
Post-Market Surveillance Information |
The Product Manager finalizes the Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR), which is at least reviewed by the Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC). The report should contain at least the following information:
Participants |
---|
PRRC |
Product Manager |
Input | Output |
---|---|
Collected and evaluated information | Periodic Safety Update Report |
Template Copyright openregulatory.com. See template license.
Please don’t remove this notice even if you’ve modified contents of this template.