Clinical Evaluation 4 answers

Can the CER evaluator under EU MDR be an internal employee, and how to manage conflicts of interest?

Anonymous · Published December 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Is it acceptable for the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) evaluator under the EU MDR to be an internal person employed by the manufacturer? If so, what steps should be taken to address conflicts of interest and ensure a non-biased review, especially when a declaration of interest is made?

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

Anonymous 6 months ago
Are there specific notified body expectations regarding internal evaluators?
Reply to this comment

Discussion

4 Answers

Accepted answer Dr. Oliver Eidel · Founder & CEO, OpenRegulatory ·
According to MEDDEV 2.7/1 revision 4, the clinical evaluators should provide a declaration of interest. The impartiality and potential for conflict of interest of an external expert reviewer are assessed and documented by the notified body, not the manufacturer. The guidance does not require that the evaluator is completely 'free of interest,' but transparency through a declaration is necessary. If a conflict is identified, it's generally the notified body's responsibility to assess whether it impacts the evaluation's objectivity.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

A
Anonymous ·
It is quite common for manufacturers to use internal people as CER evaluators. The key point is to declare any interests or potential conflicts, as transparency is important. How the conflict is managed can vary, but it's not unusual for manufacturers to handle this internally.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

A
Anonymous ·
From what our QMS auditor told us, it's most important that you declare any conflicts of interest for transparency. It is not always possible to avoid all conflicts, especially with internal evaluators, but making them visible is key.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

A
Anonymous ·
Yes, it's the norm to use internal evaluators in many companies. Conflict of interest can be managed, mainly by declaring it, but ultimately it's up to the notified body to review the situation if there are concerns.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Want to add your answer to this question?
Write an answer under your name by logging in or signing up, or post anonymously.

Still have a question? Ask a question here publicly — for free.

Or talk to one of our consultants — first calls are free. Check out our services and prices.

Looking to automate your regulatory work? Check out our eQMS, Formwork. Built for lean, founder-led companies. There’s a free version too.