Clinical Evaluation 2 answers

Does software that analyzes EHR blood test results meet FDA CDS criterion 1?

Anonymous · Published March 13, 2026 · 1 comment
Our company has a device that analyzes blood test results, biological sex, and age, with all input information coming from the electronic health record (EHR). According to the new FDA guidance on clinical decision support (CDS) systems, does this scenario meet criterion 1 for exclusion from the device definition?

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

Anonymous 3 months ago
Further clarification on the specific outputs of the software and intended use may help determine if all criteria are met.
Reply to this comment

Discussion

2 Answers

Accepted answer Dr. Oliver Eidel · Founder & CEO, OpenRegulatory ·
Yes, based on the FDA's guidance, you likely meet criterion 1. The guidance clarifies that analyzing results (e.g., blood test outcomes) rather than direct measurements or patterns from a signal acquisition system fits criterion 1. For example, they mention that software providing a list of cholesterol-lowering drugs based on EHR cholesterol levels and demographics is a Non-Device MDDS and meets criterion 1. If your device uses analyzed results from the EHR, it aligns with this example and does not analyze raw measurements or patterns.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

A
Anonymous ·
I attended a recent FDA webinar where they clarified that single measurements from an EHR are considered "medical information" and not "signals," so you probably meet both criteria 1 and 2. However, make sure to review criteria 3 and 4 as well—you need to meet all four exclusionary criteria to be considered a non-device CDS. If your analysis provides specific diagnostic or treatment recommendations, or if the healthcare professional can't independently review the basis for the output, then you may still be considered a device. Check out the examples in the FDA guidance for more detail.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Want to add your answer to this question?
Write an answer under your name by logging in or signing up, or post anonymously.

Still have a question? Ask a question here publicly — for free.

Or talk to one of our consultants — first calls are free. Check out our services and prices.

Looking to automate your regulatory work? Check out our eQMS, Formwork. Built for lean, founder-led companies. There’s a free version too.