Technical Documentation 2 answers

Using Own Device as Equivalent Device During MDD to MDR Transition

Anonymous · Published December 25, 2025 · 1 comment
Is it permitted to use a company's own device as an equivalent device during the transition from MDD to MDR? For example, if a device was Class I under MDD and will transition to Class IIb under MDR, can pre-clinical data from the original Class I version be used for the new MDR submission? MDCG 2020-5 mentions data from a manufacturer's own presumed equivalent device but does not specify if it must be from another manufacturer.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

Anonymous 6 months ago
Seeking clarification on equivalence data sources for MDR submissions.
Reply to this comment

Discussion

2 Answers

Accepted answer Dr. Oliver Eidel · Founder & CEO, OpenRegulatory ·
They can stay Class I under MDD until 2024. After that, you’ll need to comply with MDR and potentially be reclassified depending on the intended use and risk according to the new rules.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Accepted answer Dr. Oliver Eidel · Founder & CEO, OpenRegulatory ·
If you haven’t introduced significant changes to the device, and the data collected under MDD is sufficient, you generally wouldn’t need an equivalent device—the device itself serves as its own reference. However, if there are changes (like updates to the algorithm or UI), you should update your Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) to address these differences and demonstrate that prior data is still applicable. MDCG guidance allows use of your own device's pre-clinical data as long as you can justify equivalence and the data matches the current version’s intended purpose and performance.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Want to add your answer to this question?
Write an answer under your name by logging in or signing up, or post anonymously.

Keep reading

All questions
A

Is it sufficient to use literature data only for MDR clinical evaluation of SaMD, or is own clinical data required?

Anonymous · 3 comments
6 months ago
We are a software medical device manufacturer currently under risk class I MDD, but will be in risk class IIa under MDR. For the upcoming MDR certification, is it necessary to generate our own clinica
Accepted 2 answers

I recommend reviewing the MDCG 2020-1 guidance for Software Medical Devices. Clinical evaluation for software according to this guidance is based on t

A

How to demonstrate clinical equivalence for MDSW when competitor data is unavailable?

Anonymous · 1 comment
6 months ago
We are developing a medical device software (MDSW) that appears equivalent to others already on the market. However, we do not have access to detailed technical descriptions or clinical data of these
Accepted 2 answers

In clinical evaluation based on equivalence, a key issue is legal access to clinical data from the equivalent device. Regulations, such as MDR, often

A

Are amendments to the Declaration of Conformity needed for non-significant UI changes shown in screenshots?

Anonymous · 1 comment
6 months ago
For legacy MDD devices, if a change is made to the user interface (UI) that is purely cosmetic (e.g., color of a separation line) and not related to presentation of medical data, the MDCG 2020-3 guida
Accepted 6 answers

Linguistic validation is required when language could impact the device's safety or performance, especially if the device will be used in countries wi

Still have a question? Ask a question here publicly — for free.

Or talk to one of our consultants — first calls are free. Check out our services and prices.

Looking to automate your regulatory work? Check out our eQMS, Formwork. Built for lean, founder-led companies. There’s a free version too.