The IVDR Might Require 264 Notified Bodies
Notified Bodies Realize That IVDR Could Be a Problem
In November last year, Notified Bodies released a position paper in which they argue that the IVDR could pose some problems (surprise).
Some interesting numbers here: Under the IVDD, only 7% of IVDs required a Notified Body assessment while that number will climb to 84% (!) under the IVDR. That's a 12-fold increase - crazy!At the time of writing, only 4 Notified Bodies were designated under the IVDR, with one dropping out on Dec 31st, 2021, due to Brexit. (Now there are 6; under the IVDD, there were 22.)They proposed postponing the IVDR or extending the transition (grace) period. They partially blame it on Covid. So, doing some simple math here.. if we have a 12-fold increase in Notified Body Assessments, wouldn't we need a 12-fold increase in Notified Bodies? That would be 264 Notified Bodies then. Instead we have.. six. Thinking further, now, those six Notified Bodies have to increase their efficiency by a factor of 44 to cover the workload.
European Commission Extends IVDR Grace Period
The European Commission amended the IVDR (press release) to extend the grace period. It's somewhat hard to simplify, but the TLDR is that you can, at minimum, make your device available until May 26th, 2025 (at least), if you declare your conformity until May 26, 2022. This transition period might be even longer, based on your risk class.
I think it's somewhat ironic that "patient safety" is mentioned multiple times in the amendment in the context of "the IVDR will endanger patient safety because IVDs will disappear from the market". Wasn't patient safety the goal of the MDR and IVDR in the first place? But now we have to slow down their implementation for patient safety. Okay.
We're heading towards another "let's place all sorts of devices on the market until May" scenario this May. This time not for MDD, but for the IVDD :)
So if you're an IVD startup, now's the time to get your product done.
Website and Template Updates
A very small update to these two templates to include placeholders of mentioning your 62304 software safety class. It's enough if you mention your class in one of those two places - and can point that out to an auditor when they're looking for it.
On a different note: Do you need any help with your EU MDR efforts?
We've worked with 100+ companies and helped them certify their devices in weeks, not months. Talk to us now – first calls are free! Check out our services and prices here.
Or, if you don't like talking to humans, check out our Wizard. It's a foolproof, step-by-step video course for getting your compliance done yourself.
And if you're looking for the best QMS software for lean, founder-led companies, check out Formwork. It automates your compliance, and there's even a free version for you to try out!

ISO 13485 Amendment, Templates, User Manuals

Brace for Impact: The New MDR Transition Periods
IVDR Requirements: What You Need To Become Compliant
Congratulations! You read this far.
Get notified when we post something new. Sign up for our free newsletter.
No spam, only regulatory rants. Unsubscribe anytime.
0 comments
No comments yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!

Dr. Oliver Eidel
Through OpenRegulatory, I’ve helped 100+ companies with their medical device compliance. While it’s also my job that we stay profitable, I try to dedicate a lot of my time towards writing free content like our articles and templates. Maybe that will make consulting unnecessary some day? :)
If you’re still lost and have further questions, reach out any time!