Technical Documentation 1 answer

How to handle MDR (EU) 2021/2226 Article 5.3 and 5.4 requirements for eIFU?

Anonymous · Published February 02, 2026 · 1 comment
I am looking for guidance on how to handle the requirements from Article 5.3 and 5.4 of (EU) 2021/2226 regarding electronic instructions for use (eIFU):
  • Article 5(3): What system and evidence can be used to demonstrate that instructions for use (IFU) in paper format can be delivered to any EU member state within 7 calendar days?
  • Article 5(4): The manufacturer must provide, on the device or a leaflet, information on foreseeable medical emergency situations. How should this be addressed?
These questions were raised by our notified body. Any practical advice or examples of compliance would be appreciated.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

Anonymous 5 months ago
Can you clarify if your notified body requested specific types of evidence or just general proof of process?
Reply to this comment

Discussion

1 Answer

Accepted answer Dr. Oliver Eidel · Founder & CEO, OpenRegulatory ·
We had similar questions during our technical file review. For Article 5(3), we put an SOP in place to ensure that when a request for a paper IFU comes in, we can deliver it within 7 days. Our SOP is pretty basic and mentions using an international express shipping service, but we haven't validated the process yet. During a technical file review, that seemed acceptable, but for an audit, I could imagine the notified body might want to see some evidence—maybe a test shipment to one country or proof of delivery within 7 days.
For Article 5(4), it really depends on your device's risk assessment. In our case, we determined that there are no foreseeable medical emergency situations, so we indicated in our gap assessment that 5(4) is not applicable. We didn't mention this explicitly on the label or IFU, just documented the rationale internally.
Notified bodies are required by Article 8 of EU 2021/2226 to review compliance with Articles 4 to 7 during conformity assessment, so we're planning to validate our process further for future audits.

Join the discussion. Leave a comment. Guest comments are welcome — add your email to get reply notifications.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Want to add your answer to this question?
Write an answer under your name by logging in or signing up, or post anonymously.

Still have a question? Ask a question here publicly — for free.

Or talk to one of our consultants — first calls are free. Check out our services and prices.

Looking to automate your regulatory work? Check out our eQMS, Formwork. Built for lean, founder-led companies. There’s a free version too.