Kiwa Dare

Updated August 13, 2026

Kiwa Dare is a conformity assessment body based in the Netherlands, identified as notified body NB 1912. NANDO lists it as currently designated under the EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR). Its detailed NANDO scope shows the device categories and conformity assessment activities covered by that designation.

2 Reviews

4.5 Good · 2 reviews
Read all reviews
Overall experience
4.5
Well-organized / responsive
4.0
Regulatory pragmatism
4.0
Technical competence
5.0
Log in or sign up to contribute your own notified body review. It’s free.

May 25, 2022

Review by company with 1-9 people

QMS audit done
Techdoc audit done
Overall experience
Well-organized / responsive
Regulatory pragmatism
Technical competence
Wait time before QMS audit
0 Months
Wait time before Techdoc audit
1 Month
Wait time before QMS certificate
1 Month
Wait time before Techdoc certificate
1 Month
Approx. cost (EUR)
25,000 €
I have no reference for medical regulatory pragmatic rating. Compared to space 9100 i would say this is not at all pragmatic.

Additional Comments (Duration/Cost): incl. ncrs

Yes, I would choose this notified body again.

May 19, 2022

Review by company with 1-9 people

QMS audit done
Techdoc audit done
Overall experience
Well-organized / responsive
Regulatory pragmatism
Technical competence
Wait time before QMS audit
4 Months
Wait time before Techdoc audit
2 Months
Wait time before QMS certificate
2 Months
Wait time before Techdoc certificate
1 Month
Approx. cost (EUR)
23,000 €
Good communication, can call them with questions. Freelance auditor was good and had sufficient knowledge. Back and forth about significant/non-significant changes to certified product was good experience. They were quick to review and accept product changes.

Additional Comments (Duration/Cost): Application review (3000 euro); Year 1 audits (20000 euro); Surveillance audits (5000 euro); unannounced audits (7000 euro). Timelines and costs very clear up front.

Yes, I would choose this notified body again.

Related resources